"The insider said that the Assembly strength reduced to one from 13.The changed symbol was recently used at the MNS meeting before Diwali at Yashwant Natya Mandir, Matunga, where Raj addressed party functionaries. However, the change is yet to be updated with the Election Commission of India.Before the 2014 assembly elections, MNS changed the direction of the engine towards the left, and suffered a landslide defeat in the polls.A MNS insider on condition of anonymity said, "MNS won 13 seats in the state Assembly and 29 seats in the BMC election using the same symbol with the direction of the engine from left to right. Party workers use the symbol as per their convenience."

Asked whether the party had informed the Election Commission of India about change in direction for the second time since formation of MNS, Mr Sawant said, "Once the party gets its election symbol, it is in the party's discriminatory power how to use it and which direction must be accepted. However, after the BMC polls and before the 2014 assembly elections, MNS changed the direction of the engine towards the left and experienced a landslide defeat in the assembly. Shrish Sawant, custom tent manufacturers a MNS official who handles party administration affairs said, "The direction of the symbol is not officially changed.

While the symbol continues to be a railway engine, ahead of the BMC polls, its direction has been changed from left to right, said a party source.MNS chief Raj Thackeray has, for the third time, changed the party symbol. Another source claimed that a political "guru", Indore’s Bhaiyyu Maharaj has suggested that Raj change the direction of the engine in the party symbol. He also said that the party would not inform or register the change with the Election Commission. "Some leaders of the party connected the defeat with change in direction of the party symbol and thus, recently, it was changed back to the original which means the face will be towards the right," he said."Mr Sawant rubbished claims of any astrological angle behind the change in direction of the engine. Bhaiyyu Maharaj however denied giving any suggestion in this regard and said that he hasn’t met Raj in the past 10 days.

.The feud in Uttar Pradesh’s ruling family showed no signs of ending on Wednesday as chief minister Akhilesh Yadav and his uncle Shivpal Singh Yadav briefly tried to downplay their differences but remained combative otherwise. This is a fight in the government.The BJP made a surprising move on Wednesday by sending a friendly media mogul to the party chief at his Delhi residence to broker peace. All eyes are now on Mulayam Singh Yadav who may reach Lucknow on Friday to speak to his CM son to defuse the crisis. He refused to confirm or deny his resignation form the council of ministers, but said that he would work to strengthen the party.

The CM — reportedly persuaded by SP chief’s cousin Ram Gopal Yadav — hit back and stripped his uncle of his key ministerial portfolios.Sources said Mulayam Singh Yadav had made his son UP’s CM against Shivpal Singh Yadav’s wishes. The BJP wants the SP to stay strong for division of Muslim votes ahead of the crucial elections, sources said. But the feud has left party workers confused ahead of the crucial elections, sources said.Party sources said the idea behind the party chief’s Tuesday decision was to let the CM campaign with a clean image with more experienced Mr Shivpal Singh Yadav handling the party affairs.This comes at a time when the Akhilesh government is facing criticism for poor law and order in the state, and is desperately attempting an image makeover to retain power in next year’s elections. He sought to persuade Mr Shivpal Singh Yadav not to precipitate issues, which may compel the CM to split the party," a source said. The UP CM has of late been angry with his uncle for promoting his stepbrother Prateek Yadav in party affairs, sources said.Before leaving for Delhi to meet the party president, Mr Shivpal Yadav also told reporters in UP’s Saifai that he would abide by any decision that his elder brother Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav took.

The decision was influenced by Rajya Sabha MP Amar Singh, sources said. there are no differences," Shivpal Singh Yadav told reporters after the meeting.An open war broke out on Tuesday when Mulayam Singh Yadav replaced the CM with Shivpal Singh Yadav as SP’s UP chief.The CM met his close aides in Lucknow, while his uncle flew to Delhi and met the party chief. The CM said in Lucknow on Wednesday that people "outside the government" were behind the present crisis."After Amar Singh’s intervention a media mogul—recently elected to Rajya Sabha with BJP’s support — met the SP chief and Shivpal Singh Yadav at 16, Asoka Road residence of Netaji in Delhi... The CM also custom beach chair Manufacturers removed the state chief secretary on Tuesday. "There is no family fight.

If people outside the family intervene, how will the government function ", the CM said.The family feud started after the CM sacked on Monday two ministers, considered close to the party chief and Mr Shivpal Singh Yadav. He did not name Mr Amar Singh. "Everyone abides by what 'Netaji' (Mulayam Singh Yadav) says and will accept his words," he said."Both I and Netaji (Mulayam) are happy.

"The Labour party may be about to spend several months fighting and tearing itself apart.""I suspect there are many members on the Opposition benches who might be familiar with an unscrupulous boss.Observers said that line was delivered in a style uncannily reminiscent of Thatcher, who governed from 1979 until 1990.Ms May was appointed to Britain’s top job a week ago after David Cameron resigned following the country’s vote to quit the European Union, leaving her the difficult task of uniting her party and negotiating an exit from the bloc. A boss who doesn’t listen to his workers, a boss who requires some of his workers to double their work load, and maybe even a boss who exploits the rules to further his own career," she said.

Then she laid into the Opposition Labour party, whose leader Jeremy Corbyn is locked in a bitter power struggle tent wholesale suppliers in which the only female candidate dropped out on Tuesday.. Ms May pointed out that her party had made her Britain’s second female Prime Minister after Ms Thatcher.Leaning forward on one elbow, she asked Corbyn: "Remind him of anybody " before Conservative lawmakers erupted with shouts of "More" as they waved their parliamentary papers. "In my years here in this house I’ve long heard the Labour Party asking what the Conservative Party does for women, well it just keeps making us Prime Minister!," she said, as her husband Philip looked on from the public gallery.Often the only taste of parliamentary business that members of the public regularly get, the box-office drama known colloquially as PMQs is seen as a barometer of how well party leaders are doing and they spend hours preparing for it.Taunting the Opposition over women’s rights and a bitter leadership battle, new British Premier Theresa May delighted her party at her first session of Prime Minister’s Questions with an assured performance that drew comparisons with Margaret Thatcer."In my years here in this House I’ve long heard the Labour party asking what the Conservative party does for women, well it just keeps making us Prime Minister!," she said.Ms May, who styles herself as a serious, down-to-earth and unflashy leader, kicked off her remarks by welcoming a drop in unemployment and setting out plans to visit German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande. The Conservative party will be spending those months bringing this country back together."I suspect there are many members on the opposition benches who might be familiar with an unscrupulous boss.

Taking to the floor on Wednesday for the 30-minute grilling by MPs that is the closely watched centrepiece of the British political week, Ms May won loud cheers from the Conservative party benches behind her.When Corbyn, who has refused to resign despite an overwhelming vote of no confidence by his own lawmakers, asked about unscrupulous bosses, May gave a flavour of her sense of humour. A boss who doesn’t listen to his workers, a boss who requires some of his workers to double their work load, and maybe even a boss who exploits the rules to further his own career," she said.

The meaning of Congress free country does not mean the end of the party but the political culture followed by it and remove the blot it had put on way of governance."The hold of BJP is growing in all states be it Bengal or Kerala. For winning Bihar, they needed the support of Lalu and they now are talking about a federal front", he said adding that a party having 15 to 20 seats cannot give stability. As an opponent we want Congress to remain in opposition", he said."We hope that Congress will learn something from it."Some people felt they would be regarded as progressive if they aligned with those raising a 'bharat todo ' campaign in Jadavpur and Jawaharlal Nehru University, but they have been rejected by the country", he said."

It does not seem to now improve.Congress's problem is the one faced by a party which is centred around a family. They made a historical mistake in this.. What will happen to Congress no one knows", Jaitley said at the Vikas parv of the party to observe two years of Modi government. In the history of BJP, it is at its peak in at this point of time," he said."Congress has been reduced to a crowd around a family; their problem is the one faced by a party which is centred around a family", he said. Lucknow: Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said that Congress has on Saturday been reduced to "crowd around a family", which faces all the challenges faced by a political party centred around a family. We have a historical opportunity to strengthen party, take the country ahead towards development and show that an honest governance is possible."Their problem is that they cannot attract crowd without the family and if the family is kept together the crowd does not grow", he said."The nucleus of any discount gazebos wholesale party should have power.Making a mention of the idea of federal front mooted by Lalu Prasad, Jaitley said, "it was a tried tested and failed idea tried many times in the past"."The first problem of such a party is to see that no leadership develops outside the family, the second is that if there is a powerful generation like Nehru or Indira they make the party strong but if the next generation does not have that strength it drowns alongwith the party", Jaitley said.Stressing that BJP has been a nationalist party, Jaitley lashed out at the mainstream parties for aligning with fringe elements.

In Bilari, the party is all set to field Mohammed Fahim, son of the deceased MLA Mohammed Irfan.The byelections to two Assembly segments in Uttar Pradesh next month are proving to be crucial for the Samajwadi Party which held both the seats and also the Bharatiya Janata Party which is determined to position itself as a viable alternative to the ruling party. Moreover, these bypolls will be seen as a litmus test for newly-appointed state president Keshav Maurya who is working on Mission 265 plus. The Congress is undecided about contesting the byelections. The Bahujan Samaj Party will not be contesting the byelections since the party president Mayawati sees the byelections as a "waste of time and resources". The Samajwadi Party, which is still smarting at the defeat of byelections on two Assembly seats in February this year, is keen to win both its seats this time and reassert its position in state politics. Earlier, the party had lost the Vishwanathganj seat in Pاين نام مجاز نمي باشدpgarh in the byelection. The BJP, on the other hand, feels that these byelections could set the tone for its revival in UP. "

We have learnt that we cannot be complacent any longer and the byelections to Jangipura and Bilari are a matter of prestige for us. The Jangipura seat fell vacant following the death of minister for panchayati raj Kailash Yadav while the Bilari seat was vacated when sitting SP MLA Mohammed Irfan died in a road accident last month. "We will keep all equations in mind while selecting candidates for these two seats," said BJP spokesman Vijay Bahadur Pathak because this could b the last byelections before the Assembly elections which are due early chinese gazebos next year.. In the February byelections to Bikapur, Muzaffarnagar and Deoband, the SP could retain only the Bikapur seat while the BJP won the Muzaffarnagar seat and the Congress wrested the Deoband seat. According to sources, to cash in on the sympathy factor, the SP will be fielding Kismati Devi Yadav, wife of late Kailash Yadav who held the seat, in Jangipura. Our workers are determined to wrest both the seats and herald our return to power next year," said BJP spokesman Vijay Bahadur Pathak.

She is aware that the local leadership of the Congress seeks a formal alliance with the CPI(M) but she also knows that she can bring more to the table for the Congress in national political than the Left. Since it withdrew support from the United Progressive Alliance in 2008 and then went on to lose Kerala and West Bengal, the CPI(M) has found itself an increasingly marginal force in national politics. As a former Congress leader who broke away from the parent party in 1997 because of its lack of seriousness in confronting the Left, Ms Banerjee does not have any real ideological aversion to the parent party. In a direct fight with the the Trinamul Congress, its defeat seems pre-ordained.

Its natural ability to punch above its weight thanks to its influence among intellectuals and in the media has also been compromised, not least by the emergence of the Aam Aadmi Party that has stolen some of its thunder. First, the CPI(M) has recognised that the existing Left Front (that includes parties such as Forward Block, Revolutionary Socialist Party and Communist Party of India) are not in a position to defeat Mamata Banerjee. Ms Banerjee could do with Congress support, just as the Congress could do with the Left’s votes.When the West Bengal State Committee of the CPI(M) meets on February 12/13 to discuss its electoral strategy in a state which was regarded as an unassailable "red fort" until five years ago, it will be guided less by ideology (or whatever remains of it) and more by the imperatives of sheer survival. It may be a reflection of the growing "normalcy" of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) that the desire of its West Bengal unit to forge an alliance with the Congress for this summer’s Assembly election isn’t premised on mumbo-jumbo assumptions such as the crisis of global capitalism. In 2011, the Congress was the junior partner in a mahajot with the Trinamul Congress.A comic aspect of Communist politics is the insistence of the party of the red flag that its mundane political manoeuvres are always guided by lofty ideological consideration, not the least of which may be the "world situation". For the party in West Bengal, it is also a battle for physical survival. She is on excellent terms with Sonia Gandhi and is fully aware of the fact that — owing to its direct fight with the Left in Kerala — the Congress would rather ally with the Trinamul Congress than the CPI(M). The Trinamul Congress is still a relatively new phenomenon in North Bengal, as was demonstrated by the CPI(M) winning control of the Siliguri municipality last summer. At one level Mrs Sonia Gandhi is willing to embrace a party of radical social democracy but she has her eye firmly set on a robust grand coalition that can overwhelm the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance in 2019. In a curious sort of way, the Congress is confronted by problems that are similar to those faced by the CPI(M). At one time it appeared that the Left Front could lose its status as the principal Opposition to the Bharatiya Janata Party.

But whereas Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee may be viewing the issue through the narrow prism of state politics, the state unit’s larger conclusions correspond with the instincts and inclinations of the comrades who see themselves in the mould as Harkishan Singh Surjeet rather than Prakash Karat. Following the slow and steady erosion of its support base, the Congress is today a sub-regional party that exists in the border districts of Murshidabad, Malda and the two Dinajpurs. If the CPI(M) took the Yechuri line to its logical conclusion and subsumed the party into the Congress, life would have been much easier. The writer is a senior journalist. Many of those who symbolised the Left at the local level before 2011 have now switched over effortlessly to the the Trinamul Congress. The Congress has the necessary independent standing to win handsomely in North Bengal if the Left transfers its votes. The vicious political culture of the state — whose origins date back to the three decades of Left rule — has left very little space for Opposition parties. Under Left rule, Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamul Congress loyalists found it extremely harrowing to operate politically; under the present dispensation, little or no room is given to the Left. Indeed, if there is a real chance that the Congress-CPI(M) entente in West Bengal will materialise, Ms Banerjee will travel an extra distance to persuade the Gandhis to revive the 2011 arrangement. In 2016, the national influence of the Left is at its lowest point since Independence. As long as the Congress was in power at the Centre, the local Congress maintained a nominal presence centred on its ability to secure and distribute political largesse from New Delhi. The CPI(M) Politburo that will take a final call on the subject later this month may feel that its West Bengal unit waterproof tents Factory is over-doing its politics of pragmatism. Today, these are threatened by the Trinamul Congress that showed its independent clout in the 2014 Lok Sabha election. Consequently, the CPI(M) fears that a second consecutive political defeat will result in the near-total decimation of its already fragile political base. They have changed affiliations but maintained the same culture of muscle flexing and intolerance. But for that to happen, the CPI(M) probably needs to experience its obsolescence a little more profoundly. Consequently, following the landslide victory, the Congress managed to win a sprinkling of seats in areas other than its North Bengal strongholds.

The grim reality that confronts the veteran leaders in Kolkata’s narrow Alimuddin Street is not appetising. However, even that pipeline has been choked since 2014. In the rest of the state, not least in Kolkata, Howrah and southern Bengal, it exists as a rump made up of individuals who have fallen out with the Trinamul Congress. But while that challenge has been averted — thanks in no small measure to the BJP’s own remarkable short-sightedness — the CPI(M) has been unable to mount any challenge to the Trinamul Congress. The CPI(M) desperately needs to piggy back on either the Congress or other regional parties to regain a foothold in the national power equation. Secondly, the CPI(M) is inclined to view the 2016 Assembly election as more than a political contest.

"It's only normal and natural that there will be divergence in views. Nath, who had on Thursday gone to President Pranab Mukherjee to explain to him the rationale behind bringing the Ordinance, downplayed the change in the party stand.. "Government always owes explanation to the party because the party is the one, which decides the policies and guides the government. "It is his (Rahul Gandhi's) view and he has expressed the view of many many people in the party, so obviously suggesting that the government should have a re-look at it.New Delhi: The Union Cabinet China portable gazebo Manufacturers is likely to meet on October 3 or 4 to take a call on possible withdrawal of the controversial Ordinance on convicted lawmakers, whose fate appears to have already been sealed after Rahul Gandhi's strong denunciation of it.

The PM said that he will address the issue, when he is back," Nath said.So if the suggestion has come from the party, then that has to be given weightage by the government," Shukla said.An indication about the likely fate of the Ordinance was available when Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath said that Gandhi expressed the view of many many people in the party, obviously suggesting that the government should have a "re-look" into it."In the last six decades, there have been a number of occasions, when party has got the government's stand changed. So, the party is a guiding force. It has happened in the past and the Prime Minister is responding. Party's job is to give direction to the government.As the party crisis managers got into a damage control mode, Government sources indicated today that a meeting of the Union Cabinet to deliberate on the Ordinance is likely to take place on October 3 or 4.. His deputy in the ministry Rajiv Shukla insisted that the party's job is to give direction to the government. It is our party.